He subsequently found at the five sites a total of 11 fragments representing at least five individuals. Together, he said, these provide evidence that the chimpanzee-sized creature was not an ape but an early ancestor of humans.
"These canine teeth are not of humans, but no chimp has canine teeth like that either," White said. "This argues that these fossils are not from the common ancestor of both chimps and humans, but from very early in our evolution, shortly after our ancestors parted company and before our canines fully reduced."
Another argument that the fossils are from a hominid, not an ape, is that the toe bone shows a slanted surface at the rear joint, which is characteristic of bipedal walking. This is caused by toeing-off pushing forward by leaving the front part of the foot on the ground and lifting the heel. This anatomy is characteristic of A. ramidus and all later hominids, but not of chimpanzees and other apes, which walk on the outside of their feet.
The toe bone "is consistent with an early form of terrestrial bipedality," Haile-Selassie concluded in his Nature paper.
His continuing search for more fossils from the same period should give a better idea whether the new finds are an early form of A. ramidus or a species ancestral to it.
Haile-Selassie also noted that fossils found in Kenya last year and dated at 6 million years by a team of French paleoanthropologists are ambiguous, even though the researchers claimed they are the oldest human ancestor and named the fossil creature Orrorin tugenensis. Until more bones of this animal are found and more studies conducted, he said, it is impossible to say whether Orrorin is the earliest human ancestor, the earliest chimpanzee, or the common ancestor of both.