July 2005

Research uncovers continued union decline and increasing availability of flexible working

Union representation in British workplaces has continued to decline since 1998, though the rate of decline has slowed compared with recent decades. There has also been a substantial increase in the availability of flexible working arrangements including home-working, term-time only working, flexi-time and job sharing.

These conclusions are based on a wealth of evidence from the Workplace Employment Relations Survey (2004), which is co-sponsored by the Department of Trade and Industry, Economic and Social Research Council, Policy Studies Institute and ACAS. They appear today in a first findings booklet, Inside the Workplace.

The survey is the largest and most up to date of its kind in Britain. The results are based on face-to-face interviews with around 3,200 managers and nearly 1,000 worker representatives across Britain. Over 20,000 employees in those same workplaces returned completed questionnaires. The large sample size and high response rate gives a clear indication of the reliability of the findings.

Compared with 1998, employees were less likely to be union members, workplaces were less likely to recognise unions for bargaining over pay and conditions, and fewer workers had their pay set by collective bargaining. Even so, the rate of decline appeared to have slowed compared with the 1980s and 1990s and the joint regulation of terms and conditions remains a reality for many employees in Britain. In 2004, one-half of employees were employed in workplaces with a recognised trade union; one-third were union members; and 40 per cent had their pay set through collective bargaining. Nonetheless, the picture differed markedly across sectors of the economy and by workplace size. Union involvement in pay setting and the joint regulation of the workplace were very much the exception in the private sector and in smaller workplaces. In the public sector collective bargaining coverage actually rose between 1998 and 2004.

The survey also records a substantial increase in the availability of flexible working arrangements, including home-working, term-time only working, flexi-time and job-sharing. Taken together with other findings from the survey such as the increased incidence of paid paternity leave and special paid leave, and increased managerial understanding of employees' responsibilities outside work, it seems that employers are taking on board the need to help employees effect a balance between their working and family lives. However, employees did not perceive such a change in employer attitudes, and were often unsure whether or not flexible working arrangements would be available to them.

A detailed summary of the research is attached as Annex A to this notice. For further information from ESRC contact: Keith Whitefield (02920 876870 or 07967 850052) for PSI contact: Alex Bryson (0207 468 2225 and 07969 179755); Helen Bewley (0207 468 2278); Hannah Liebing (0207 468 2201).

Annex A

THE WERS SPONSORS' STATEMENT OF FINDINGS

5 July 2005

Some of the key findings (for workplaces with 10 employees or more) are:

Work-life balance



Employee representation

Workplace conflict



Equal opportunities policies

Gender segregation in managementThe management of employees and high commitment management practices

Numerical flexibility

Employee and workplace well-being

Notes to Editors:

1. Copies of Inside the Workplace: First Findings from the 2004 Workplace Employment Relations Survey by Barbara Kersley, Carmen Alpin, John Forth, Alex Bryson, Helen Bewley, Gill Dix and Sarah Oxenbridge can be obtained free from the DTI's publication order line on 0870-150-2500 (44-870-150-2500) or email them at: [email protected] quoting the URN number 05/1057 or ISBN: 0 85605 370 8. It can also be downloaded from the DTI's Employment Relations Directorate website: www.dti.gov.uk/er/inform.htm or from the Routledge website: www.routledge.com/textbooks/0415378133. Editors are welcome to reproduce any of the figures or tables contained in the booklet.

2. WERS 2004 is the fifth in series of workplace employment relations surveys. Previous surveys were conducted in 1980, 1984, 1990 and 1998. The Survey comprises two elements: (i) the Cross-Section Survey which involves face-to-face interviews with managers responsible for employment relations at the workplace on a day-to-day basis, face-to-face interviews with worker representatives and a Survey of Employees; (ii) the Panel Survey which involves face-to-face interviews with managers in a random sub-sample of workplaces that took part in the 1998 survey. These workplaces were revisited to provide an accurate picture of how workplaces have changed over the intervening period between the two surveys. The principal topics that the current survey addresses are: training and recruitment; consultation and communication; employee representation at work; payment systems and pay determination; collective and individual dispute resolution procedures; equal opportunities; work-life balance; employee well-being; and workplace performance. The employment size threshold was lowered to include workplaces with at least 5 employees, to provide a separate analysis of employment relations in small businesses.

3. The findings are based on interviews with around 3,200 managers (2,195 in respect of the Cross-Section Survey and 991 in respect of the Panel Survey), almost 1,000 employee representatives, and over 20,000 employees completed questionnaires, representing response rates of 64 per cent, 77 per cent, 78 per cent and 61 per cent, respectively. Main fieldwork for the survey ran from February 2004 to April 2005 and was conducted by the National Centre for Social Research (NatCen). All findings reported in the booklet relate to workplaces with 10 or more employees. Further information on the survey is available at http://www.dti.gov.uk/er/emar/wers5.htm .

4. Two publications arising from the survey and written by the survey research team will be published in Spring next year. The sourcebook of the survey findings, Inside the Workplace: Findings from the 2004 Workplace Employment Relations Survey will map the state of employment relations in British workplaces in 2004 and early 2005, and will be published by Routledge. It will describe the principal structures, practices and outcomes of workplace employment relations. The book will also examine change since the last survey was conducted. The analysis will be based on workplaces with 10 or more employees. A separate publication, to be published by the WERS Sponsors and in collaboration with the Small Business Service, will examine employment relations in small businesses and organisations.

5. In November 2005 the survey data, fully anonymised, will be deposited in the UK Data Archive for further analysis by bone fide researchers.

6. Details about the WERS Sponsors: The Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) drives the UK's ambition of 'prosperity for all' by working to create the best environment for business success in the UK. The Advisory and Conciliation and Arbitration Service (Acas) aims to improve organisations and working life through better employment relations. The Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) is one of the UK's leading research funding and training agency addressing economic and social concerns. The Policy Studies Institute (PSI) is one of the UK's leading independent research organisations. It undertakes and publishes research studies relevant to social, economic and environmental policy. The PSI's involvement in the study was made possible with a grant from the Nuffield Foundation.

7. Details of the authors of Inside the Workplace: First Findings from the 2004 Workplace Employment Relations Survey: Barbara Kersley is a Principal Research Officer at the Department and Trade and Industry (DTI); Carmen Alpin is a Senior Research Officer at DTI; John Forth is a Research Fellow at the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) and on contract to DTI; Alex Bryson is a Principal Research Fellow at the Policy Studies Institute (PSI); Helen Bewley is Research Fellow at the Policy Studies Institute; Gill Dix is a Principal Research Officer and Head of Research and Evaluation at the Adivisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (Acas); and, Sarah Oxenbridge is a Senior Research Officer at Acas.

8. The authors write in a personal capacity and their views do not necessarily reflect those of the sponsoring bodies.